🔗 Share this article

Just two days prior to the NYC race for mayor, Michael Lange issued a bold electoral prediction – going beyond the winner citywide, and precinct by precinct. Lange, an expert in elections born and raised in New York City, has spent more than ten years in progressive politics and has become a kind of well-known figure recently for his deep dives into city data and polling.

He published his extremely precise forecast map – which correctly forecast that Zohran Mamdani would win while missing Andrew Cuomo’s strong performance – on his newsletter, the Narrative War. Lange possesses a talent for clever terms. He pointed out, as an example, the divide between the progressive stronghold, running from one neighborhood to Bushwick to Astoria, where he predicted (correctly) that the left-wing candidate would win by huge margins, and the conservative-leaning zone on affluent parts of Manhattan. There, “the Free Press and Wall Street Journal outrank the mainstream paper” in readership and the majority of electors leaned toward Cuomo, who ran as a moderate alternative.

Voting Day Patterns and Surprises

What was your night?

It was necessary because they were adding around 200,000 votes into the tally frequently! I was actually somewhat anxious initially: The candidate led the early vote by 12 points, but came large groups of ballots added after that and his lead dropped from 12 to 8%. I was worried.

Understand, it was possible in which yesterday turned out somewhat badly for Mamdani, where the opponent was going to end up essentially increasing his support from the earlier contest. But the winner added 500,000 votes to his primary coalition, and that’s a huge reason why he succeeded. He went out and massively expanded his support from the primary.

Coalition Building

Where did the mayor-elect get additional support from?

He built the alliance that the left long aimed for: diverse racially, youthful, tenants and individuals squeezed by affordability. He improved considerably with Black and Hispanic voters, everyday New Yorkers, relative to the earlier election. Plus he boosted his base of left-leaning activists, youthful radicals, and immigrant groups. He couldn’t have won without expanding his appeal.

He created the alliance that progressives long aimed for: multiracial, young, tenants and residents struggling with costs

Additionally, there were a number of Trump/Mamdani voters – is that a big trend?

It is a real thing, confined to working-class Latinos, Asian communities and Muslims. Voters in ethnic enclaves that supported Trump previously backed the progressive this year. But I wouldn’t say he was winning over Caucasian laborers and Trump loyalists.

Turnout and Effects

A major development of the night was the record turnout. Who did that help?

Both sides. Participation was much greater than anticipated. I thought it could exceed two million, but it reached 2.3M – that is a lot of darn voters. There was a substantial opposition group, energized, but his supporters was equally driven, and that was enough to win.

You predicted he’d get over half the ballots. Is he on course for that?

Right now you would say he’s likely to get over half. He’s at just over 50% but remain around 200,000 votes left to report as of Wednesday morning. Thus it’s not certain, but I think it’s likely, and I hope he achieves it because then none can claim the Republican was a disruptor.

Republican Collapse

Curtis Sliwa, the Republican candidate, was another surprise. His support completely collapsed.

He didn’t win a single precinct in any borough. Not even one neighborhood in Staten Island, similar to an 88% Trump neighborhood. That really was unexpected. Cuomo kept Caucasian districts, very wealthy areas and devout communities, and plus gained many conservatives on the island who had a high participation. I believe there was significant strategic balloting by the Republicans. They were doing it before the former president tweeted his support for Cuomo, but that definitely helped. It might have changed the outcome unless Mamdani’s coalition failed to expand.

Progressive Strongholds

What about your often-discussed left-wing base – did backing for Mamdani dominant in those parts of Brooklyn and Queens?

In my view existed some weakening of the progressive zone in certain places like neighborhoods that have older Caucasian residents. There, for example, the property owners and homeowners supported Cuomo. Thus there existed some opposition. However no, largely the leftist base is another huge reason why Zohran won – he scored between high percentages in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Jewish Voters

In the lead-up to the vote there was coverage on if Mamdani was gaining ground with the community. Any indication that he did?

There are areas with a lot of secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – such as specific locales – where he did well. But in the wealthy Jewish communities like the Manhattan area, his position on Israel definitely mattered in those places. Similarly in the more middle-class Jewish areas including Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they all leaned Cuomo. Plus, you have Jewish immigrants from the former Soviet Union in the borough, who were pretty staunchly supportive. Therefore I don’t know if there were crazy narrative-busters here, but he did hold left-leaning areas and including sections of the Upper West Side by big margins.

Long-Term Significance

Has Mamdani rewritten what New York means politically? Will the commie corridor become a launch pad for leftwing candidates?

Yes, it’s no coincidence that some of the biggest political leaders from the left hail from a handful of neighborhoods in the boroughs. I believe that we’ll see more of that – candidates will emerge from these areas to be promoted to higher office.

However I believe that every city in the US can have similar progressive hubs. Urban places are the epicenters of progressive influence in the nation – since youth reside there, tenancy is common and they are places where individuals struggle by the disparities exist.