🔗 Share this article

The count of guaranteed seats for Indigenous council members on NZ councils will be cut by more than half, following a controversial law change that forced local governments to submit the fate of hard-earned Māori seats to a popular referendum.

Historical Context on Indigenous Representation

Māori wards, which can include multiple elected officials depending on local population numbers, were established in 2001 to give Indigenous voters the option to vote for a assured Indigenous council member in municipal and provincial governments. Originally, local governments could only create a Māori ward by initially submitting it to a community referendum in their region. Communities often devoted considerable time generating community backing and urging their councils to create Māori wards.

Legislative Shifts and Government Actions

To remedy the issue, the previous Labour government permitted municipal authorities to set up a Indigenous seat without first requiring them to subject it to a public vote.

However, this year, the current administration reversed the change, saying local residents should decide whether to establish Indigenous representation.

Voting Outcomes

The new legislation required local authorities that had created a electoral district under Labour’s rules to hold decisive public votes concurrently with the municipal polls, which ended on October 11. Of 42 councils participating in the public vote, 17 voted to keep their seats, and twenty-five to disestablish theirs – showing many regions opposed to guaranteed Māori representation.

The results represented “a vital step in reinstating local democratic control.”

Opposition parties however have condemned the new policy as “discriminatory” and “anti-Māori”. Since taking office, the coalition government has implemented sweeping rollbacks to policies designed to enhance Māori health, wellbeing and representation. Officials has stated it wants to terminate “race-based” policies, and asserts it is dedicated to enhancing results for Māori and all New Zealanders.

Geographical Splits

Outcomes of the referendums were divided down city-country divisions – most urban centers required to vote backed Māori wards, while rural regions skewed heavily towards disestablishing them.

“It’s a real shame for the Māori wards that had only just come in – they’re just beginning to hit their stride.”

Voter Turnout and Concerns

This year’s municipal polls recorded the lowest voter turnout in over three decades, with under one-third of citizens casting a vote, leading to demands for reform.

This approach had been “a mockery”.

Differential Standards

Local governments are permitted to create different electoral districts – including rural wards – without first requiring a public vote. The disparate requirements placed on Māori wards indicated the administration was singling out Māori representation.

“Well, they failed. Many communities have expressed strong opposition.”

This statement concerned the 17 areas that voted to retain their wards.